Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Finals week is soon, but don't be AAFraid!
This will be the last "meeting" of the semester, so please stop by! If I don't see you there, have a great break, and I look forward to seeing you all next semester! We already have many exciting things planned, and I am really looking forward to it. Adios!
~Franklin
Monday, December 7, 2009
Maybe God Isn't Invisible
The problem with atheist debating
As usual, our side is all about the evidence. Their side is all about rhetoric and appeals to biases. Guess which side fares best in the debate format? It's even true in their books: note that Meyer's book is subtitled, DNA and the Evidence of Intelligent Design, and he couldn't gasp out any evidence at all for their theory, which they cannot even state.
I'm not sure what the answer to his question is (concerning which side fares better). I think he's implying that the secular side does, but I have serious doubts. I have always wondered why every single "Does God exist?" debate doesn't end with the atheist side dominating over the other. After all, there is little decent evidence for the existence to God, and just about everything that a theist can bring up has relatively easy and well documented responses. So why can't we easily win debates? And debating a creationist should be significantly easier than debating over the existence of God. Any "evidence" a creationist brings up should be and can be easily disputed. So what are they doing that we aren't?I think that this is the problem we're faced with: Using evidence in a debate isn't as effective in moving a crowd to agree with you as charisma is. Having a scientist come up and blather on about the evolution of a mitochondria might prove the point, but the sad thing is that audiences are also largely influenced by the debaters' charisma as well, even if some people just end up talking about cosmic broccoli.
So, what's the solution? Should we dumb down our argument to appeal to the common folk? Make ourselves more entertaining? I think that we have to find debaters that are likable and connectible to the common audience, regardless of belief. Dan Barker does a good job with this, but unfortunately it seems that most people agree that his debating skills are not on par with his intelligence.
And while I love Hitchens and Dawkins, they aren't exactly the kind of people that I would desire to just have a casual conversation/some tea with. They just aren't very friendly.
I might have seen him smile once. Maybe.Friday, December 4, 2009
Look, we're famous!
Blood drive combats low donation rate
The Atheists, Agnostics, and Freethinkers registered student organization sponsored a blood drive Wednesday at the YMCA located on S. Wright Street.The RSO sponsors a blood drive every February, but it has held a blood drive in December before, said Julia Mititelu, organizer of the blood drive and senior in LAS. She added that a primary reason for the timing of this specific blood drive was also because the stock of blood available is lowest during the month of December.
“We found it kind of ironic that the reason people don’t donate during the holiday season is because of the holidays,” she added. “You wouldn’t expect that with Christmas and Hanukkah coming up.”
Sarah Johnson, Red Cross representative, said there are many reasons behind the shortage in the blood supply. Among them is the flu season leaving many possible donors ineligible.
“Often, people that do come in to donate with us aren’t even eligible because they are too sick,” she added. “There are many factors that come to play that end up making this season especially difficult to receive blood donations.”
Johnson said that to combat this difficult season, the Red Cross attempts to book as many blood drives as possible. She said the Red Cross divides the employees into two teams, red and white, to encourage competition and schedule as many blood donations as possible.
The blood drive was relatively successful on Wednesday, said Franklin Kramer, president of Atheists, Agnostics and Freethinkers and senior in Media. He said compared to what was expected around finals week, the turnout for the drive was especially good, even busy.
Mititelu said on Wednesday that the group had 24 walk-ins, 18 of whom ended up donating.
Kramer said the members of the organization encouraged members of other interfaith groups to participate, volunteer and donate blood.
“We’ve been trying to up the interfaith thing with groups on campus,” he added. “We’ve been trying to push this as an interfaith event with students from all different faiths coming to sign up and volunteer.”
Atheists, Agnostics, and Freethinkers has co-sponsored a blood drive before with RSO Campus Crusade for Christ, which was successful, Kramer said.
Kramer said that he was looking forward to seeing more donors when the group sponsors a drive again in February. And while group members said they were happy with the turnout this month, they are still looking for more support in the near future.
“The more the merrier,” Kramer said.
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
Pro Tip: Staring into the sun can damage your eyes
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8390184.stm
I wish I was making this up.
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
I <3 Sarah Palin and her new autobiogrAAFy!
Directions for party:
Get on Green St. heading east in the direction of ISR from the Union. Go past ISR, and past Lincoln Ave. all the way down to Birch. Make a left on Birch, and then a left on Elm. Our house is one in from the corner.
If you get off the bus at Springfield and Birch, just make a right on Birch and then a right on Elm.
Buses that get you near here:
13N Silver (Stop at Springfield and Birch)
10E Gold "
50E Green (Stop at Green and Birch)
5E Green "

